Table A6. Heterogeneity Test for others' alcoholic populations.
Paper A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 Total chi2
Blum et al, 1 13 8 22 5.884
1990
0.613 7.851 13.535
Bolos et al, 3 12 25 40 3.554
1990
1.115 14.275 24.610
Blum et al, 3 39 47 89 2.856
1991
2.481 31.762 54.757
Comings et al, 3 41 60 104 0.658
1991
2.900 37.115 63.985
Gelernter et 1 18 25 44 0.536
al, 1991
1.227 15.703 27.071
Parsian et al, 0 13 19 32 1.135
1991b
0.892 11.420 19.688
Schwab et al, 0 11 34 45 4.289
1991
1.255 16.059 27.686
Cook et al, 1 4 15 20 2.320
1992
0.558 7.138 12.305
Goldman et al, 0 14 32 46 2.122
1992
1.283 16.416 28.301
Turner et al, 0 9 38 47 7.766
1992
1.310 16.773 28.916
Amadeo et al, 3 18 28 49 2.122
1993
1.366 17.487 30.147
TOTAL 15 192 331 538 33.243
For each phenotype, the observed number is shown above, with the expected number shown below. The chi-2 value for each row is also shown, along with the total chi-2 for the table. The degrees of freedom is the number of rows minus one times the number of columns minus one, in this case, df=(11-1)(3-1), or 20.
Table A7. Heterogeneity Test for others' control populations
Paper A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 Total chi2
Blum et al, 0 4 20 24 1.646
1990
0.915 5.488 17.597
Bolos et al, 8 30 89 127 2.276
1990
4.840 29.042 93.118
Blum et al, 0 6 25 31 1.576
1991
1.181 7.089 22.730
Comings et al, 0 24 84 108 4.428
1991
4.116 24.697 79.187
Gelernter et 3 21 44 68 2.663
al, 1991
2.592 15.550 49.858
Parsian et al, 0 3 22 25 2.979
1991b
0.953 5.717 18.330
Schwab et al, 8 14 47 69 11.422
1991
2.630 15.779 50.592
Cook et al, 0 6 14 20 1.237
1992
0.762 4.574 14.664
Goldman et al, 2 11 23 36 1.655
1992
1.372 8.232 26.396
Amadeo et al, 0 7 36 43 3.089
1993
1.639 9.833 31.528
Total 21 126 404 551 32.972
For each phenotype, the observed number is shown above, with the expected number shown below. The chi-2 value for each row is also shown, along with the total chi-2 for the table. The degrees of freedom is the number of rows minus one times the number of columns minus one, in this case, df=(10-1)(3-1), or 18.